<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quickie: Cropping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomdibble.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/quickie-cropping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomdibble.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/quickie-cropping/</link>
	<description>Just Words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Simon</title>
		<link>http://tomdibble.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/quickie-cropping/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomdibble.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom, some good information there. Action and sports photography are great candidates for cropping since so much is out of the photographer&#039;s control and you don&#039;t want to be too tight, since you can&#039;t get it back. From my documentary point of view, I would never &quot;paint that extra in&quot;, because I have chosen to capture reality without altering it in any way beyond the traditional color correcting and exposure controls. Not meaning to get on a high horse here, but this is how documentary photographers operate ethically, since any changes made in one photo puts doubt over an entire archive that photographer has produced. It&#039;s journalism and it&#039;s the code of ethics photojournalists live by. Those who have breached this code have damaged their reputations and career in ways they could never recover from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom, some good information there. Action and sports photography are great candidates for cropping since so much is out of the photographer&#8217;s control and you don&#8217;t want to be too tight, since you can&#8217;t get it back. From my documentary point of view, I would never &#8220;paint that extra in&#8221;, because I have chosen to capture reality without altering it in any way beyond the traditional color correcting and exposure controls. Not meaning to get on a high horse here, but this is how documentary photographers operate ethically, since any changes made in one photo puts doubt over an entire archive that photographer has produced. It&#8217;s journalism and it&#8217;s the code of ethics photojournalists live by. Those who have breached this code have damaged their reputations and career in ways they could never recover from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
